2014 Star/Yamaha Bolt and Bolt R-Spec – First Look New Star cruiser delivers hip, stylish attitude at an affordable price.

2014 Yamaha Star Bolt R-Spec - Camo Green

Just as we were beginning to wonder if the tuning fork company would ever awake from its recession-induced slumber, Yamaha is proving there’s still lots of fight left in its blue bones. The new Star V Star 1300 Deluxe and Yamaha FJR1300A, both of which performed well in recent tests, are excellent proof. And now there’s the new-for-2014 Bolt and Bolt R-Spec, a pair of neo-bobbers just unveiled by Star at a recent press conference.

Like Harley-Davidson and Honda—both which have a lot of momentum right now—Yamaha understands that fresh, stylish and affordable motorcycles are key to resurrecting sales. But rather than building a classic-styled bike, Yamaha opted to build something with a “younger character,” to borrow the words of Star’s Product Manager Derek Brooks.

“The big deep-fendered, classic-styled bikes are still very popular but they were more popular five, six or seven years ago,” explains Brooks. “We’ve seen the cruiser market transition through the chopper trend to back-to-basics bikes that prove less is more. The focus is now more on the motorcycle itself and less on chrome and flashy paint. This is a solid trend and I think that the Bolt is going to be very appealing to all types of riders.”

2014 Yamaha Star Bolt R-Spec

Adding to that appeal are MSRPs of $7990 for the standard Bolt and $8290 for the R-Spec. Yamaha keeps prices in check by utilizing the air-cooled, 942cc fuel-injected V-Twin already used in the V Star 950, and this 60-degree engine mounts in an all-new, double-cradle steel frame. With a low 27.2-inch seat height, shortish 61.8-in. wheelbase, slim body and uncluttered shape, the Bolt does indeed have a bobber look, and its suspension is handled by a conventional 41mm fork with 4.7 inches of travel and pair of rear shocks that offer 2.8 inches of cush. Twelve-spoke cast aluminum wheels are fitted with bias-ply tires in sizes 100/90-19 front and 150/80-16 rear. Sportbike-style wave brake rotors measure 298mm front and rear.

Clearly, the Bolt’s styling is a mix of old-school bobber and modern. The 3.2-gallon teardrop tank has subtle badges, the front and bobbed rear fenders are made of steel, and contemporary touches include an LED taillight in a classically styled housing, and an LCD speedometer beneath a smoked lens. The two-into-one exhaust features black headers, but with heat shields and muffler done in contrasting aluminum. Gold-anodized shocks with piggyback remote reservoirs distinguish the R-Spec model, which also has an upgraded saddle with contrast stitching. The standard Bolt is available in Raven or Pearl White, whereas the R-Spec comes in Matte Gray or Camo Green. Additionally, Star has created an extensive accessory line that will give these bikes many different looks. Want mini apes and bags? Star has ’em. Sissy bar? Check. Bikini fairing? Affirmative. The possibilities are endless, as could be seen by the numerous custom versions on display at the Bolt’s press unveiling.

Star’s 2014 Bolt arrives at dealerships in April, while the R-Spec model arrives a bit later, in mid-summer. We’re told there’s an extensive demo program in the works, in which multiple semi trucks will take Bolts all around the U.S for test rides. Find out where they’ll be at www.starmotorcycles.com.

  • roma258

    I’m not a cruiser guy, but I don’t hate it. Put a decent seat on it and you have a nice standard.

    • artist_formally_known_as_cWj

      I thought it was a standard already. Feet under knees as God and Steve McQueen intended.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1186192957 David Schieferstein

    Yamaha has created the Harley Sportster. Wait, what? Come on guys, an air-cooled parallel twin or triple is where your 4-stroke history lies, embrace it. It’s worked out damn fine for Triumph! Even Honda gets it!

    • http://silodrome.com/ James McBride

      Agreed. It’s a Nightster clone and it isn’t even subtle about it.

      • Guest

        bu tis it better…?

      • barney

        Why, does H-D own a patent or something on simple, straightforward V-Twin cruiser designs? Get real.

  • fliegerad

    Where’s the Bolt-Exif edition: Pipe wrap, Firestones, electrical taped “X” over the headlight, missing fork springs (but with gators!), handlebars de Torquemada, Stasi approved paint hue (Or Bass Boat Metallic Flurry!), potato chip front fender, missing air filter, and gum/wrap grips?

    • John Burns, Feature ed.

      in the Genuine Star Accessories Catalog of course.

      • fliegerad

        Catalog available at a release party that nobody knows about yet (except for the 28 readers of the similar number of identical blogs). First 10,000 catalogs will come with hand laid Pabst ring stains on the cover – artsy (i.e., drunkard produced) video of “The Making of Stained Covers” coming soon…

    • barney

      Shame about your bitterness…you might want to seek help.

  • http://profiles.google.com/biggsquidd Archie Dux

    I would like to see it tested head-to-head against a Sportster, a Bonneville, and a Guzzi V7.

  • http://www.facebook.com/martin.buck.338 Martin Buck

    The specs look a bit confused. The US site says tubed tires. The Canada site says tubeless. The XV950 has tubeless. But radials tires should be the minimum standard. And the design is based on sporty – chopper rather than comfort, but Star generally do well in this area. All round, it is a great effort for Yamaha, whose earlier examples were a tad style challenged. I could live with the green one.

    • http://www.facebook.com/martin.buck.338 Martin Buck

      Oh yeah – there are spoked wheels in the catalogue – so no point in having modern tires to go with them!

      • bagelbites

        So tubed tires it is then? That’s lame if the bike has cast wheels by default.

  • CrumblyChris

    Nice Sportster. I’ll bet that it’s even slower than an 883.

    • bagelbites

      Well, from the stats I’ve seen, the 883 makes 47 hp and 45 lb-ft torque while the 942cc engine used by V-Star 950 (and Bolt) makes 45 hp and 50 lb-ft torque. All stats are at the wheel not the crank. The 883 weighs 585 lbs wet while the Bolt supposedly weighs 540 lbs wet. I’ll bet the 883 is slower. Not like that should be relevant anyway — it’s a cruiser. If you want something fast, that’s the last style of motorcycle you’d buy.

      • http://www.facebook.com/brett.lewis3 Brett Lewis

        The Bolt is closer to the Sportster in all ways than the Bonneville, which beats both in the spec dept., 67 hp and 50 lb-ft, 495 lb wet. Also it looks like the Bonnie will have reasonable suspension travel in the rear, better rake up front, better wheel/tire sizes for riding the twisties – all that is apart from the looks and style of course.

    • barney

      Don’t forget to don your Star Trek booties before you ride your silly Gixxer.

  • bagelbites

    The Bolt is essentially a Sportster copy, but I like the looks more than the Sporty. If only they would ditch the air-cooled motors. I’ve owned air-cooled bikes, but after owning a couple water-cooled ones, I’d never go back. Also, 2.8 inches of rear travel? Seriously? You’d better live in a well-paved area. I wish they’d come out with two new models: a 3-cylinder R6 and a 450cc supermotard. Yamaha, you’re my favorite brand, but you need to make a supermoto (and not a 250cc one either)!

    • barney

      Yeah, that car radiator hanging off the front of your industrial washing machine styled motor is lovely….also when your warranty runs out on your overly complex car engine you can look forward to getting skinned alive at your dealership….LOL. I’ll take a simple air cooled beautiful looking motor any day of the week.

  • rounder

    Alright the new virago! The reason Yamaha wont eat harleys lunch is because a sportster is America, unchanged for 50+years, a fella can look at the motor and tell what’s going on beneath the quality cast covers and with simple tools bolt on an extra 30 horsepower in an afternoon. whats the resale on a vstar? Why aren’t guys rebuilding old viragos from the cases up? Go after the ducati market with this one Yamaha.

    • bagelbites

      While there are a lot of parts for Sportsters, I wouldn’t exactly bring “quality” into play when talking about the Sportster engine. I’ve had extensive use of the Sportster engine, and they eventually leak oil from the rocker cover and require changing the gasket. Can’t say I’ve had the same experience with the Japanese bikes I’ve had. Granted, none of my Japanese bikes were ever v-twin motors. Now, H-D’s big twin engine is a quality piece, and I’ve not had experience with leaks on them. (I’m referring to recent H-D engines above — as in, the past 6 years.)

    • My2cents

      Why is everyone so concerned about resale? Did you buy it to ride or to look at? I’ve owned seven Harley’s and resale was never part of the equation. I really like this new Bolt, granted it looks sportsterish with a slight Roland Sands touch, but it is very appealing with 942cc.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/John-Riehle/1023154085 John Riehle

    Ten years from now it will make the “ugliest” motorcycle list. WOW…

    • barney

      Do you promise to eat your hat when it turns out you don’t know what you’re talking about? LOL…

      • John Riehle

        It’s like putting lipstick on a pig!

  • Daddio

    I am glad I’m not the only one who first thought “Sportster” when seeing this “new” Yamaha. I for one am very disappointed. I had seen some prototype Yamaha V-Twin pics that gave it much more of a sport bike look. There are more than a few folks who have taken the Virago base and made a nice sport bike, some cafe, some flat track, but not a cruiser. Aren’t there more than enough of them already? I would think if you want a bike that looks like this, you’d just buy a Sportster or one of the other cruiser-style bikes (Victory Hammer, perhaps?). I know, I know, they’re not all the same, I don’t want to get anybody torqued off about this. You have to admit, though, that the seat won’t be good for more than a short ride, and even if you can handle that, how far can you get on 3 gallons of gas? How is this bike any different than the others? I’m just disappointed in Yamaha, this could have been a V-Twin I would have bought (afforded!). Oh well.

    • bagelbites

      Daddio, perhaps you’re thinking of the Yamaha MT-01 that was released in Europe (I believe). There was also a 600cc model that was similar to it, but I can’t remember the model name. Anyway, Yamaha never brought the MT-01 to the States, which is unfortunate because it was a good-looking, sporty v-twin.

    • barney

      Yeah…thats what we need…another “sports bike”…you know…to go with the other 10,000 sports bike styled monstrosities……gak.

  • http://www.facebook.com/steve.klose.35 Steve Klose

    A very tidy design — Yamaha (Star) should do well with this. NOW can we have a café racer?

    • bagelbites

      Only if they make my 450 supermoto, too. :-P

  • http://www.facebook.com/dean.hewitt.334 Dean Hewitt

    It supposedly weighs around 540 lbs, up to 50 lbs less then a sportster and 100 less then my street bob . I suspect it will have more horsepower then the harleys. Like the look and love the price. Green would work. I do wish it was water cooled..

    • barney

      You’re kidding me right…water-cooled? Yeah, a big honking car radiator hung off the front of the bike is just what every bike needs. I think you should go don your ICON branded jacket and star trek booties and get back on your Gixxer and leave right now. ugh….

      • Guest

        Shame about your bitterness…you might want to seek help.

        • barney

          Oh I am seeking help….my high priced shrink allows me to go to town with a 12 pound maul on a brand new sportsbike every visit.
          I think I’m gettting better….

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=686933615 Larry Jackson

      I completely agree! It is what I have been waiting for. Looks like a FUN bike. Barney is wrong. Water cooled would be great and I have a Suzuki Intruder with a “cooler” on the front and it looks great! To each his own! This most likely will be my next bike.

      • barney

        He said ‘a Suzuki Intruder’ ha ha ha ha ha…….poor bastid.

  • Skokie Swift

    From some angles I like, others don’t impress.

  • Blinkin Scout

    Does it have an ABS option ? I would only buy this bike for my wife if this option was available.

  • Dennis Porter

    There’s no doubt this is a Sportster clone, and it looks as if the Roland Sands catalog threw up on it. However, I ride an ’07 Nightster, and the Bolt has a better suspension, a steeper lean angle, better ground clearance, and better brakes. My bike has more than enough torque–79 lb/ft–to overcome the weight differential, but it has a 1,200cc engine. The Bolt’s performance should compare favorably with an Iron, which starts at $7,999. Plus, you can accessorize a Bolt quite a bit (though not nearly to Harley levels). I visited the Star site and loaded a Bolt with all the accessories you can see in the right-side view, Camo Green R-Spec in the gallery, above, though I used the Stiletto seat. It came in at $10,399. A bone-stock 48 comes in at $10,599 (though it does have a 1,200cc motor). I accessorized an Iron for comparable performance and fit as much as possible using Harley’s Bike Builder, and it came in at $9,196. And that excludes all the aesthetic trim bits, which aren’t available on the Bike Builder. For the market segment Yamaha is after, they did this right.

  • Bronau

    Oh no! Here comes some nut on a Bolt!

  • barney

    I would have been very interested if that motor had been an air cooled, 360 degree, parallel twin and the frame was a straight UJM design with 18 inch wheels front and back finished off in classic 60′s style aesthetics. Something that they could put up against the Bonneville/Thruxton, W800, Moto Guzzi’s V7, Honda’s new CB1100 and the incipient Norton Commando.
    Instead its a pretty boring looking Sporterish V-Twin, yawn, …..while I’d definitely take the Sportster over this they should have built the Brit styled UJM.

  • tbone70

    same as always….the Japanese doing it better than Harley….even when they copy them….or when they go they’re own way….been like that since 1985 when Reagan had to save Harley on the tax payers dime from the Japanese onslaught…the only thing that changed was americans were forced to make better motorcycles (mostly on borrowed Japanese technology)….that’s just the way it is….

  • Alaska pat

    LOVE IT!!!. But i think yamaha has already made this bike back in 1983. Air cooled, single overhead cam 900cc v-twin cruiser. It was called a virago920, But i seem to remember it being faster in 1983. (12.8 second quarter mile)

  • Xerxes

    I would rather go for this, 940cc, 75hp

  • Xerxes

    The Guzzi Bellagio that is of course, a pic. did get lost here somewhere!

  • mike

    An oil cooler and four gallon gas tank would make this bike sell better.Belt drive is definitly the way to go.

  • barney

    I love it….looks great (for a cruiser that is). Sensible price, doesn’t have a silly car radiator hanging off the front of it,…doesn’t look like a silly GP bike, not ridiculously overpowered, not too hot…not too cold…just right. (Although I prefer vertical twins rather than V-twins). Not as pretty as the Kawi W800 but good for Yamaha. They’ll sell like hot cakes too.

  • ALASKA PAT

    75hp????? try more like 47hp!!!!! the virago920 is for sure faster!!!