New MotoGP Rules Explained Will new regulations lead to better racing?

2012 Moto2 World Champion Marc Marquez

After meeting last December in Madrid, Spain, the Grand Prix Commission issued a sheaf of new rules and procedures that will become active in 2013-2015. The four-person commission consists of representatives from the FIM, Dorna, IRTA and MSMA.

Three basic areas were addressed:

1) a penalty points system for dealing with “unsportsmanlike” riding;
2) implementation of an on-dash flagging/rider-information system; and
3) cost control or reduction.

The penalty points system is intended to discourage rough riding by spelling out the “wages of sin,” which are as follows:

• 4 points: rider starts the next race at the back of the grid
• 7 points: rider starts the next race from pit lane
• 10 points: rider is disqualified from the next race

Obvious inspiration for this is Moto2 World Champion Marc Marquez’s recent and well-publicized knock-down of Simone Corti last fall in practice at Valencia, Spain. The new system urges riders to consider actions against consequences—just as parents urge their small children to do.

Everyone has been expecting an on-dash flagging system since it became technically feasible. This will be optional in 2013 (for those whose systems already support it) and mandatory in 2014.

Other regulations will set a procedure by which to “freeze” homologated engines in MotoGP (aim being to prevent technological advance during the racing season), price ceilings in 2015 for suspension and brake components (and their service contracts) and, to be announced at the season-opener in Qatar, maximum prices for Moto3 bikes and Moto2 chassis and major components. Some chassis are currently priced at or above 100,000 euros—roughly $8000 per pound.

Carbon-fiber wheels will be eliminated, and from 2015, only homologated wheels will be permitted. Moto3 engines are to be randomly distributed to teams by the series organizers and will not be rebuilt. Beginning in 2014, Moto2 bikes must use updated oxygen sensors. Is this intended to prevent one or more of the many software “foxing” techniques?

In the end, what do we know or suspect? In Formula 1, the teams employ lawyers to work out all possible interpretations of the wording and their technical people use these to devise the necessary countermeasures. Engineers must first overcome the latest “social problems” (rules) and only then can they tackle going fast enough to win.

Marc Marquez, Jorge Lorenzo, and Sandro Cortese

  • riceryder

    Will new regulations lead to better racing? NO! And I will quit watching.

  • jfc1

    wow, no improvements to engine tech during the season and no CF wheels? Yet they allow the truly-stupid GPS-based TC and the fuel limit continues? just seems dumb and dumberer every time I read about it

    • http://www.facebook.com/mike.browne.3194 Mike Browne

      I think TC is ridiculous in motorcycle racing. Throttle control is one of the things that separate the men from the boys. Let the men race using real skills vs. pushing buttons to protect them from themselves.

  • http://www.facebook.com/craigs380 Craig Wicke

    Bring back the two strokes. There surely is technolog to clean them up and MOTO-GP is where it is developed.

    • oldironnow

      That’s what I’ve been saying. What’s more prototype these days then a two-stroke race motorcycle?

    • http://www.facebook.com/mike.browne.3194 Mike Browne

      I agree. 2 stroke technology could really be the next step in gasoline engine technology (if electric doesn’t get there first). Direct injection lets them run as clean or cleaner than a 4 stroke, become as efficient in fuel consumption, far less parts so cheaper, and dang it, everyone loves the smell and sound of a 2 stroke motor! Bring back the bees!

      • Tony Carlos

        1995 called and wants it technology back. 2 strokes had their chance to reemerge in the auto industry. They failed. Their emissions were marginal and their durability insufficient. Look up Orbital.

  • http://www.facebook.com/mike.browne.3194 Mike Browne

    Great, here come the lawyers. Using “interpretation” of the rules to use for racing strategy. There’s always been rule interpretation, but lawyers? Next they’ll be sueing each other and holding court dates to determine who really won a race.

  • http://www.facebook.com/mike.browne.3194 Mike Browne

    Great, here come the lawyers using “interpretation” as race strategy. Rule interpretation has always been part of the game but a lawyer can make a case that the moon is really made of cheese. Next they will all be suing each other and courtrooms will be used to determine race winners.