Staff Stuff: 1974 Norton 850 Commando Editor Hoyer’s classic British daily rider.

1974 Norton 850 Commando

Do you like riding vintage bikes but get completely tired of the bull$#!t? Yeah, me, too. That’s why I bought back my 1974 Norton 850 Commando Roadster (he says without irony).

After I sold this very Commando about 10 years ago, I’d done a couple of Velocettes (one of which I still own and love, even though it hurts me so) and enjoyed my now-sold ’58 Triumph Trophy, but between the more aged performance (or lack thereof) and lighting/reliability issues, I thought I’d step a bit forward in time and bought the Norton back.

Forgetting my emotional connection to this particular machine, the 750 and 850 Commando are perhaps the most practical, usable-in-the-modern-world classic Britbikes. They handle well, have great power, a good electrical system and a disc front brake. Most important, Isolastic rubber engine mounts quell what would otherwise be intolerable vibes from the big parallel-Twin.

The aftermarket is huge for these bikes. You can change almost everything from standard, and often these changes are even for the better… Because I ride the bike quite a bit for commuting and on long trips, I’ve made a few upgrades. By far the two most effective have been new carburetors and electronic ignition.

1974 Norton 850 Commando engine

I prefer the stock, correct-for-period look, so I opted for the recently introduced Amal Premier Concentric carburetors (about $170 each) to replace my worn original Concentrics. The main improvements offered by Premiers are a longer-wearing hard-anodized forged aluminum slide (replacing zinc), ethanol-resistant “Stay-Up” float, and a real, changeable idle jet (standard is a pressed-in bushing). I had to swap to a richer slide cutaway than ’74 stock due to the changes in (crappy-for-carbs) modern pump gas vs. that which was offered back in the day. Replacement slides cost $37 each, but if you happen to know your tuning specs ahead of time, most dealers will provide the carburetors set up to your specification.

After careful synching, futzing around with the air screws and adjusting needle heights, carburetion is very good. Fuel consumption is in the 50-mpg range most of
 the time. Hard to beat and they have been completely trouble-free.

Stock Commando ignition is dual points and centrifugal mechanical advance. The system can work well and be reliable if all is in perfect shape, but the moving parts and weight-return springs are typically worn out after decades of use, leading to inconsistent performance and erratic idle. My choice to replace the analog stuff, after advice from pros, was an Australian-made Tri-Spark Classic Twin electronic ignition ($342). The red-anodized, cookie-sized unit bolts right in where the stock ignition used to be. Minor alteration to wiring retains the stock harness and look, so no one will be the wiser. The Tri-Spark offers a good advance curve and an idle-stabilization protocol that really works.

JRC Engineering imports both Amal and Tri-Spark brands. To find a dealer, visit jrceng.com.

My 850 Commando was transformed by these changes. Idle, throttle response and overall running quality are excellent. It starts first kick most times and runs without a hiccup.

  • Goff

    I,ve got a 1971 Triumph TR6R fitted with a Pazon electronic ignition system that works really well. Better than points and reliable as can be. Made here in new Zealand as well. Goff

    • http://www.cycleworld.com/ Mark Hoyer, Editor-in-Chief

      I’ve heard good things about the Pazon. My advance was quite worn, so electronic is a big improvement. Ride safe.

  • http://www.facebook.com/philip.boncer Philip Boncer

    That’s one of the most beautiful bikes ever, IMO. My first big bike experience, back in the late ’80′s, was custody of a friend’s 750 Commando for a couple months while he was out of the area (I was a scooter boy at the time). I loved that bike. When I moved up to bigger bikes from the scooters a few years later, what I was looking for was basically a modern Commando — a 2-cyl naked sporty bike, but one I wouldn’t have to futz with so much as it would be full-time primary transportation. I got a ’93 Ducati Monster M900 brand new, which has served me really well for 19 years and over 200K miles so far. I love it. But I still want to get myself a good Commando to put beside it.

  • http://profiles.google.com/superbonnie2009 GW Field

    Shame the new Nortons didn’t hew a little closer to the original Commando; British Vert. Twin aesthetic instead of towards Japanese Superbike looks what with the silly sky pointing style seats and little GP wheels, yuk!

  • Hans Klinkingbeard

    I like the style of these bikes but don’t want to visit the past….pushing a bike for miles after it broke down (no cell phones back then) to the nearest place where it’s safe and can repaired is not my cup of tea. The past is mired in old technology that is fondly remembered and the old days weren’t always the good’ole days. As I recall Norton was the king of the old saying, “Norton motorcycles, made of tin, ride’em out, push’em in!” I guess if you ride close to home and have a good motorcycle ramp and pick-up truck, then you’re good to go.

    • sssNorton

      I’ve done some roadside repairs, but in 15 years, I’ve never pushed it or hauled it home. Just ridden it. That’s with original twin Amals and points ignition. I guess the 750 is just a superior bike!

      • Hans Klinkingbeard

        Unfortunately, I did do my share of pushing old tin. Single back then, without a car, it didn’t take me long to dig up a HONDA 350 that proved to be a reliable alternative and just as fun. I do like to look at old machines, but only from a distance.