BMW’s All-New Water-Cooled Boxer – Tech Preview It only took 90 years...

BMW R1200GS adventure-touring bike

BMW has undergone a profound transformation since 2004. Before that time, it was a defender of established tradition, manufacturing civilized touring motorcycles. Max Friz’s boxer-Twin engine architecture had defined the company since 1923. Now BMW has applied all its engineering power to new motorcycles and taken risks and made changes it never would have in the past. Larger, more powerful four-valve engines appeared, giving BMW Twins strong sporting 
performance. BMW’s four-cylinder S1000RR emerged competitive with any sportbike on the planet, and its electronic rider aids established the company as the world leader in application of such systems to production machines. The 1649cc inline-Six appeared in the K1600GT and K1600GTL to redefine luxury touring. And now BMW has completely redesigned and added liquid cooling to its trademark power-plant, the flat-Twin, and placed it at the heart of the all-new R1200GS adventure-touring bike.

Despite all the new-think at BMW, owners worldwide require that Friz’s boxer-Twin engine concept lives on. In an unstable world, we still value those things that endure. In 1922, Friz, an aviation engineer, designed a light aircraft engine for a shaft-driven motorcycle. It was self-balancing because its two pistons always moved opposite to each other, and well-cooled because its cylinders projected to the sides, out of the “wind shadow” of the front wheel. As that concept has evolved, it has assumed classic status.

BMW’s new R1200GS engine features rugged unit construction in which gearbox and clutch (now wet) are housed in the main case, and cylinders are cast in one piece with the vertically split case halves. Output is boosted to 125 horsepower at 7700 rpm, up from the previous claim of 110. Water instead of oil performs the task of “strategic cooling”—providing intensive heat-removal in critical areas impossible to cool with air alone. This new engine brings with it “E-Gas,” BMW’s throttle-by-wire system that offers the rider a choice of powerbands, each suited to specific conditions. This reflects BMW’s world-leading position in the development of electronics to remove performance compromises, knowledge gained in making its S1000RR a successful World Superbike racer.

As highways improve, higher speeds require more power, with greater engine rigidity and increased cooling capacity. Also essential is the ability to meet likely future required reductions in emissions, noise and fuel consumption. Simultaneously, motorcycles are changing in a basic way, as it has become possible to alter powerband and suspension electronically, giving the rider power and response closely appropriate to conditions. Our own sense of balance enables us to move confidently over any terrain; should a truly modern motorcycle do any less?

Fuel/exhaust system cutaway

Air enters the large airbox through two intakes, flows down to the cylinder heads, mixing with fuel from the injection throttle bodies, is burned in Cosworth-style, narrow-valve-angle, pentroof combustion chambers, and then exhausts downward, the two pipes joining into a single flow to a muffler on the right side.

As long ago as 1989-92, BMW prototyped a super-performance boxer, the 1000cc, 140-hp R1. Its engine—surely created to explore the possibility of BMW’s entering the World Superbike championship—had some remarkable features. Double overhead cams operated four valves per cylinder desmodromically. Unlike traditional BMWs, whose exhaust is at the front of each cylinder and intake at the rear, the R1 
featured what BMW calls “vertical flow-through,” with intake entering from above and exhaust leaving from below. This achieved a straighter, higher-flowing intake system without competing for space needed for the rider’s knees. To achieve the lean angles of which modern tires are capable, the R1’s engine was raised and its accessories moved beneath it.

More recently came the HP2 Sport version of the air/oil-cooled flat-Twin, with angle-ground double overhead cams operating four radial valves per cylinder. Radial valves seek to achieve a faster burn by concentrating more charge close to the single central sparkplug.

Now let’s explore the new GS engine. Like the R1 prototype, engine accessories are underneath, allowing a high cylinder position without excessive rise of the center of gravity. Also like R1, the heads employ vertical flow-through, with intakes on top, exhausts neatly on the bottom. Unlike R1, the cylinders are no longer separate but have become unitary with the crankcase, giving maximum rigidity and eliminating base gaskets. Like the R1, but contrasting with the HP2, the new GS’s four valves per cylinder are in pent-roof orientation, the 40mm inlets tilted away from the cylinder axis at 8 degrees, the 34mm exhausts at 10 degrees, giving a tight, modern valve included angle of 18 degrees. Each of four cam lobes operates its valve in current Formula-One style through a short, very light finger follower whose design is derived from those used on S1000RR. Valves are held to their cam profiles by helical springs.

In each cylinder head are three gears. The central one is driven by a chain, and each of the two cams is geared to it. The left cylinder’s cam chain is driven from the crank, and the right cylinder’s from the engine-speed balance shaft. The fact that intake and exhaust cams are separate makes it possible that future models could incorporate variable valve timing.

In any engine, some critical cooling areas are the piston’s top ring and the narrow bridges of metal between the valve seats. With hot exhaust gas flowing very near on both sides, the bridges between exhaust seats can become so hot in purely air-cooled engines that distortion and poor sealing develop. In the nine-year-old previous R1200GS, this was prevented by circulating oil through these bridges. To extend this capability to future power levels, BMW now provides more intensive cooling by switching from oil to water as the coolant liquid. Never fear, traditionalists, 65 percent of engine cooling is still direct to air!

Water-cooling system diagram

Here is the new GS’s water-cooling laid bare. Two small radiators are tucked away discreetly to dispose of heat extracted from critical regions between the valves and at the very top of the cylinder, where open-deck construction cools both the top piston ring and the base of the cylinder head. Cooled water goes to the pump at the front of the crank, then is circulated through the heads and returns to the twin rads. Apparent complexity above the engine is the coolant header tank and thermostat bypass plumbing.

Reading the specifications, we see that bore and stroke remain as before at 101.0 x 73.0mm to yield 1170cc, but valve sizes have been increased by 1 millimeter on both intake and exhausts, as compared with the HP2. Doesn’t this make the critical exhaust bridges even narrower? It does, but water cooling gets the job done.

In traditional cylinder construction, the cylinder’s top deck is a solid surface, pierced by a few coolant holes. The new GS engine has open-deck construction in which a ring-shaped coolant passage surrounds the top of the bore in direct contact with the head. “We designed the open deck to enable the precision cooling of the cylinder head,” explained R1200GS Project Manager Antonius Ruhe.

Each cylinder has its own oxygen sensor, and exhaust pipes join behind the engine where a motor-controlled valve both reduces unwanted noise at certain engine speeds and also prevents out-of-phase exhaust waves from producing dips in the torque curve.

Optimum use of intake-flow velocity to generate flame-speeding turbulence has made possible knock-free operation at this model’s higher 12.5:1 compression ratio. Fast combustion outruns the processes that lead to knock. Fuel requirement is 95 RON/91 R+M/2.

The center of a boxer-Twin is its 180-degree crankshaft. Some ask why BMW does not support the center of the crank with a third main bearing. Engineer Ruhe said, “It was also a target to optimize the friction in the engine. For this reason, an additional bearing is used only if it’s necessary. In the new engine, a third main bearing is not necessary because the boxer crankshaft is short and we reached 30 percent more crankshaft stiffness compared to the previous one.”

Ideally, the shaking forces of the two pistons would cancel each other perfectly, but because their two connecting rods must be offset from each other, piston-inertia forces twist the engine back and forth slightly around a vertical axis. “This vibration is the reason for using a balancing shaft,” said Ruhe.

On the front of the crank is the water pump, and on the rear, a large outer-rotor alternator. The crankshaft drives two concentric shafts below. The inner shaft takes engine power aft, through a cam-and saddle torsional absorber, to the new, smaller-diameter, eight-plate ramp-type slipper clutch. The outer shaft, driven at crank speed, is the balance shaft
to which
 Ruhe refers.

Earlier boxers have a single, large clutch friction disc whose considerable rotational inertia produces the traditional “clack” at each upshift. A new, smaller multi-disc clutch reduces this inertia. The single-plate clutch operated dry, but because slipper-clutch operation (BMW calls it “anti-hopping”) can generate considerable heat, the heat-dissipating ability of wet operation becomes useful. This clutch is easily serviced through the engine front cover.

BMW R1200GS liquid-cooled flat-twin boxer engine view #5

The six-speed transmission is left of center, with the driveshaft. All gears are helical to reduce noise and increase strength by placing more teeth in simultaneous mesh. A ball-bearing shift drum positions three selector forks and engaging dog rings.

All this describes how power is made, but more important today is how much it is possible to use. The latter is the purpose of racing-derived electronic controls, which greatly increase the versatility and capability of this “travel enduro” motorcycle. The key is throttle-by-wire, allowing the ECU to “understand” what the rider needs and deliver it in the rider-selected mode. As noted in the BMW text, “…different throttle response characteristics can be set (soft, optimum, direct), according to the intended purpose.”

A rider coping 
with fast-changing traction on off-road surfaces doesn’t have time to visualize the engine’s torque curve at this instant’s rpm, then open the throttle to deliver the desired thrust to the rear wheel. But the ECU, performing a traction-control function,
easily makes this calculation many times per second.

The higher an engine’s state of tune, the less smooth is its torque curve. Torque bumps and dips are a liability when traction is limited, but the ECU can transform the real torque curve, with its ups and downs, into something smoother by opening or closing the throttles a bit to fill in dips and trim off spikes. The result is a smooth “virtual torque curve” that the rider can use with confidence.

Once an engine has throttle-by-wire, it is just a software matter to implement cruise control (optional). With wheel-speed sensing already present for ABS, it is a small step to add traction control, which BMW calls Automatic Stability Control.

While national and international race series debate the propriety of electronic controls, BMW has no doubt about them. Its E-Gas, Automatic Stability Control and Dynamic ESA adaptive suspension are altering the nature of the motorcycle and delivering new capability to riders.

How do you change an iconic powerplant like the BMW Boxer? Very carefully, to get what engineering needs to meet customer expectations and government regulations while not upsetting the traditional customers who will make the engine a commercial success.

The profound transformation of BMW continues, and as much as some things change, other things do not. Just as we like it.

  • DoctorNine

    Great article. Excellent explanations and diagrams!

  • DoctorNine

    Great article. Excellent explanations and diagrams!

  • Hyperbiker

    Good marketing can do wonders! BMW has been telling everybody for a long time that air cooling is te way to go, now they go the same way as anybodyelse and make it sound like they are innovating motorcycling! I have been motorcycling for 35 years and have owned close to 50 bikes, only two BMW and hated them both!!
    Never again…Will stick to Ducatis, triumphs and KTMs BMWs just feel numb and ugly!

    • Wayne

      When was BMW telling everyone that air cooling was the way to go? Air cooling was used on all bikes until rather recently even Ducatis, Triumphs and KTMs. Air/oil cooling was adequate for the boxer until demands for more power and efficiency dictated that air cooling should be supplemented with water cooling and BMW understood this. In college, many years ago, I had a old faded out red 900 boxer with almost 200,000 miles on it with only routine maintenance, oil and plug changes. How many Ducatis, Triumphs, or KTMs with over 100,000 miles on them without any major engine work are there out there?

      • Wayne

        You cannot say the new BMWs are ‘numb’. Just look at the S1000RR. And beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

        I’m sure with 50 bikes in 35 years, you have never gotten close to 100,000 miles on any of your Ducatis, Triumphs, or KTMs

        • Wayne

          I rode my 900 for many, many years. Every day I could. Even in the ND winter whenever I possibly could. It was my only transportation.

          • Wayne

            I took it from east coast to west coast, from north to south many times without it letting me down once (except for a flat tire or two but it had an excellent tool kit complete with tire tools, a tire tube and an embroidered rag). Try that on your Ducati.

          • Wayne

            It also had a tire pump.

          • John

            Wayne, you sound like either a BMW drone or a dealer. Get over yourself….you sound like a robot. Plenty of different brands can make the same claims.

            I’ve always liked the simplicity of the boxers, but they have drawbacks like anyone else (vibration at ALL speeds, no room for leg comfort, eternally hot feet, heads just waiting for immovable object to destroy them, etc.) My last GS (a well maintained 2001) died a horrible death when the drive shaft seized and took out the whole tranny and crank at 50,000 miles on a smooth highway. BMW’s are no ray of sunshine when they break, and they DO break expensively.

            I’ve ridden many other brands without those limitations, some with much better results. I even rode a Harley all around North and South America for 275,000 miles without so much as a broken drive belt. High tech or new tech does not mean longevity or dependability.

          • Wayne

            John, what’s your problem? So I had a BMW that I rode the wheels off of and was very happy with? Does it bother you? Too bad. I am neither a BMW drone or a dealer and I’d like to know what it is that I need to get over. Robot??? And I also own a Harley that I have over 100,000 miles.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tom-Brown/100003758243822 Tom Brown

      Got to agree with Wayne. BMW has been making water cooled K-bikes since the 70′s. No way they say air cooling is the way to go, just A way to go. According to the cutaway in this article, the coolant is not going all the way out to the heads on these new bikes, so valve adjustment should still be relatively straightforward.

      Having flogged an 1150 GS through the Alps for 6 days on the wickedest roads in Austria, Italy and Switzerland, I can tell you that they are an absolute hoot. We were leaving sport bikes far behind because of the better riding position, the huge engine braking available and the nice wide bars to make the bike do anything you want. Unlike with most sport bikes, you can see in traffic, you can actually use your mirrors too. Bad roads are no problem with all that suspension travel. While Metzler Tourance tires don’t have as much ultimate stick as pure road tires, they are very progressive at losing grip and very confidence inspiring.

      My 1200RT gets the same sort of hard treatment regularly and thrives on it. It’ll run all day above 5,000RPMs in the hills and just eats up back roads, interstates, city streets etc. These newer boxers have a stouter Paralever system. I too had a problem with oil leaking on to my clutch on my 1100 RT but it never failed me. I went in for a spline lube and they told me it was leaking and fixed it under warranty…and included the spline lube in the warranty fix.

      That bike was followed by an 1150 twin-spark and that was followed by an ’05 1200 which now has 70K on it. It’s the best of the 3 by a wide margin. EZ to service, better handling at high and low speeds, comfortable, fast and fun with 300 mile range and lots of storage. I may just run it up to 200K.

      • jfc1

        the coolant is indeed going out to the heads. Just not *into* the heads

    • orthorim

      It’s called progress?!

    • Tony Carlos

      BMW has NOT been telling everyone for a long time that air cooling is the way to go. They have been selling water cooled bikes since 1984, and have not made a pure air-cooled bike since the early 1990s.
      Your hatred blinding you.

  • Paul McM

    Sorry, it is just plain stupid to have big, bashable cylinder heads on an adventure bike if you are going to water cooling. Every advantage (if there really are any anymore) of the boxer layout is wasted once you abandon air cooling. You have to rig a secondary grid of crash bars around the cylinders so they aren’t damaged if you fall over. Why don’t the adventure wannabees understand this? I guess marketing can sell anything. Remember what P.T. Barnum said… But I will say this much about the new water-cooled GS. I got to sit on it at the Long Beach show, and it IS narrower in the tank area and less-top heavy than the current air cooled models, so that’s progress. Still I’d rather own a simple, original R80GS.

    • Wayne

      The engine is still 65% air cooled, as stated in the article so the boxer layout is not ‘wasted’ as air cooling has not been ‘abandoned’. And I don’t understand your comment about ‘rigging a secondary grid of crash bars’. BMW makes a very good set of crash bars for this bike. Please don’t call me a fool because I understand this bike better than you do.

      • Wayne

        P.S. Other manufacturers have special crash bars for the engine along with a ‘normal’ set of crush bars.

  • Cycledoctor

    Kevin, my favorite author, writing about my favorite subject, and my favorite motorcycle. This is so great.

    I ride a 2005 R1200RT. I think I might have to use the kids college fund to get one of these.

  • Chris

    A very informative article about an engine I really enjoy – the boxer. Granted I don’t really understand the adventure touring genre with its 500 pound plus, mechanically and electronically complex as well as $$$$ machines that really are just tall road goers not the dirt bikes the marketers are selling us. The boxer engine in the RT however is a treat. Yes it is different from a Ducati, KTM, Triumph et all. What makes it different is also what makes it superior in some forms. I currently own the previously mentioned brands and each has their charms; that’s why I own them. Those that knock the boxer as some have here simply don’t get it and that’s fine.
    I have been lucky enough to take a couple of longer trips through the US and Canada on an ST and an RT and I can say that for the extended open road trip, they have been my favourite mounts.
    Different horse for different courses.
    I am glad that BMW is further developing the boxer as I am certain that there will be a liquid cooled boxer in my future.

  • drivit

    finding fault with a 90yr old design? like trying to criticise Harley’s, just negative thinking. personally I can’t wait for this engine too power the rest of the boxer line up, R, GT, HP2 yumm, maybe another stab at a custom model too.

  • Tony Carlos

    I fully understand BMW’s need to go this route, but I question what’s in it for the actual owners. Added complexity and added cost all in the name of some added horsepower (of questionable worth) and the need to comply with Euro engine noise standards.

  • Hans Klinkingbeard

    I dunno know, I always liked the simplicity of the AIR-COOLED boxer motor and to me that was it’s best selling point in a world full of water-cooled bikes. To go to all the trouble to water-cool the boxer and not divert some of the water to the heads defies practical engineering in my book. If the goal was to make the bike more powerful and reliable, then the heads should have been water-cooled also. I supposed that water-cooling the heads would have made the bike exceptionally wide and odd looking and reduce the sales and no way do they want to take a hit on the sales floor. A half-a$$ measure to please the EPA is what they’ve accomplished.

  • Wayne

    You are reading something into my comments that isn’t intended. My old BMW was the best engineered bike I’ve ever owned, and I owned many in 43 years. Sorry if that offends you.

    • Hans Klinkingbeard

      No offense, but I do find it amusing. All bikes have faults and the boxer motor isn’t exempt. In fact, it’s about as exciting as a 25hp air-compressor that you would buy from Harbor Freight. The exhaust note on boxer motors sounds like a muffled fart compared to most other bikes and is totally uninspiring to most folks. BMW’s also have very unorthodox switches and extremely high maintenance costs (again compared to most other bikes) and I could go on but it just gets uglier and uglier. I just can’t be duped into buying overpriced technology that doesn’t benefit my motorcycling experience. I’ll stick to reasonable motorcycles that get the job done and leave the “boutique” bikes to those with money to waste.

  • Bmwbkr

    My first bike was an 1150R, I agree with much of the praise for and criticism of the boxer design – In the end, we all have different orders of priority with respect to what set of criteria create the ultimate riding experience. For me, smoothness, click clack sounds and exhaust note were all reasons why I wanted to try other bikes too. Did I love my R1150R, yes – it was awesome. I also love my Harley and they are very different beasts. Now I’m seriously considering a Diavel or a BMW GT. For me it’s all about Functionality, Reliability, Ergonomics, Beauty, Performance, Fun… not necessarily in that order.

    • Alex the dog

      I never thought of my GS, or any post-1996 BMW as a reliable machine. Complex electricals, ridiculously expensive repairs, over-engineered mechanicals that proved to be too fragile became the new reality.

      BMW’s have become “boutique” bikes that are purchased only by the elite and snobs who will discard them well short of their useful life because they can. And the factory loves this clientele because the bikes integrity will never have to be proven over the long run.

  • drivit

    if you can’t read at least look at the diagrams, the things more than sufficiently cooled, understressed and ready to make HP2 horsepower, did you read about better hiways needing more power and efficiency? high maintenance costs? tried getting a ural tuned up lately? in africa?

  • dennis james

    Due to increased EPA regulations and the competitions motors producing more horsepower, BMW had to liquid cool the boxer motor as upping the compression ratio and/or adding cc’s produces more heat which would hurt the longevity of the motor. Ya, Harley does have large air cooled motors, but they have to keep the compression ratio way down to avoid over heating which is why their 1800 cc motors don’t produce as much power comparatively speaking. Soooo, this is just the next evolutionary step in their boxer design, as was adding oil cooling to the original air head back in the 2000′s… and people complained then also.
    I just know that I want one.