Honda NC700X – Road Test That’s right, 73 mpg and room for junk in the trunk.

Previous 1 2 3Next

Honda NC700X - action #5

As described in the “NC700X: Fuel-Efficiency Game-Changer” sidebar, one of the greatest benefits of this low-revving, undersquare engine design is excellent fuel economy. At the end of a spirited day of riding on the NC, we recorded 59 mpg, a bit short of Honda’s 64-mpg claims but still impressive considering the throttle had been pinned wide-open quite a bit of the time. Riding more sedately but still with a touch of sportiness, we got 73 mpg on our very first attempt at a “good” number. If the 700X is ridden conservatively, 80 mpg is not out of the question—impressive by any standards.

Another benefit of the Honda’s tuning is a remarkable degree of torque from just above idle. This can be a huge confidence-builder for novice riders learning how to master a clutch by making it dead-easy for anybody to glide away from a stop. In fact, with smooth clutch application, the NC can be put in motion cleanly and stall-free with your right hand completely off the throttle.

A glance at the dyno graph explains why this is so. The engine is making 30 foot-pounds of torque at 1600 rpm, and it rises to 40 ft.-lb. by 2600, staying above that mark until 6200 revs, just 300 short of redline. And its peak torque, 44 ft.-lb., puts it right on par with Kawasaki’s Versys and ZX-6R and Triumph’s Street Triple R. But, again, the riding experience on the 700X is completely different than it is on any of those other bikes.

Although “soul” is mentioned in the same sentence with “Twin” more often than with any other cylinder layout, the NC700X’s engine will never be accused of having a lot of character. It’s too quiet, smooth and linear in delivery to be thought of as soulful. But it doesn’t sound like a scooter, either. It thrums through the bars and pegs a bit, and the low-pitched engine note is barely audible at cruise.

Honda NC700X - left-side rear view

Judged on engine performance alone, then, the NC700X might seem a bit vanilla; but thanks in large part to its chassis, the Honda is a really fun bike to ride. There is nothing special or high-tech about the frame or suspension, yet the NC offers excellent handling, whether in a straight line or through backroad twisties. The engine’s forward-canted cylinders contribute to a low center of gravity, which also makes the bike feel lighter than its 451-pound dry weight suggests. So, despite having a longish 60.5-in. wheelbase, the 700X is surprisingly agile. It flicks into corners with a light push or pull on the grips, arcs through on the chosen line without protest, doesn’t drag anything until you’ve reached an impressive lean angle and gives off nary a wiggle along the way. The engine might not be wailing like a 600 repli-racer on boil, but the NC’s attainable speed through corners is amazingly high.

Honda’s wise choice of tire sizes plays a role here. The unfashionably narrow 160/60-17 rear matched with the typical 120/70-17 front, both Metzelers, contributes to the 700’s quick, easy turn-in. From parking-lot speeds to high-speed sweepers, the steering is neutral and predictable, which instills trust.

Honda had to cut corners somewhere to keep the base model’s price under $7000, and the suspension and brakes are what got budgetized. Neither system detracts from the overall riding experience, though, and certainly not for the NC700X’s intended use. Most riders will find that the conventional 41mm fork and Pro-Link shock’s plush ride combines with reasonably controlled overall damping to make the bike perfectly comfortable for everyday riding. And the 5.4 and 5.9 in. of travel front and rear, respectively, means it takes a big hit to bottom the suspension.

Previous 1 2 3Next

  • Mark

    Sat on one at the Cleveland motorcycle show in January – two issues I noticed which eliminated the NC700X as an option; first, which I may have been able to get over, ABS not being available with the standard shift version and second, a veto from the voice behind me. The pillion seat was clearly designed for style not utility which is a real shame in an otherwise well thought out bike. I bought a new VStrom 650 instead which addressed both of these issues.

    • TonyC

      I would think the rear seat was designed to cover the fuel tank, which probalby limits it’s comfort. Aftermarket seats are a rather common choice for those with particular tastes.

  • Joseph

    Thank you for putting performance numbers!
    I think the style is completely wrong if Honda wants to attract new buyers. New buyers know nothing about motorcycles except what’s in the movies, and all the action stars are riding conventional nakeds. Honda should have brought the NC700S to the U.S.

  • Matt

    I’m one of the prime targets for this bike as it had been
    20+ years since I’d last rode. I have
    ~1k and a month on it and I love it.
    They hit the mark with this bike.
    It was easy to get back into riding with the low torque and balance of
    the bike. Stop sign on a steep hill, no
    problem even 2 up. Great bike for
    commuting and fun on the back roads. My
    only complaint has been the seat. It
    seems to be a compromise for shorter riders which makes it a bit uncomfortable for
    some. I plan on a seat upgrade this
    winter. Gas mileage has been upper 60s
    around town and goes up from there with more back road and freeways. Check out some forums and you will find new riders and seasoned riders trading in for it.

  • TonyC

    Logical design, comfortable, great mileage, good luggage options. It’ll never sell!
    Can you say Pacific Coast?

  • Peter

    Overall it actually looks well thought out. However, this is not a “new” idea. Aprilia has had the Mana for several years now and this is almost a direct knockoff with better efficiencies. I have a couple of bikes and a few cars but 90+% of the time I find myself jumping on my Vespa gts250.
    Living in LA I can ride every day and usually do. With year-round perfect weather and daily bumper to bumper traffic, it’s the perfect combination for a twist-and-go.
    My classic Guzzi has become once in a while ride. When you commute or just bounce around shopping and gathering, you want convenience and storage. Effective lane splitting is also a must.
    The biggest hurdle for me to get past is the made in Japan thing. I have always owned Italian, English or American bikes. Even though the Mana costs a couple of grand more, depreciation looks like it might be twice as bad on the honda as on the Aprilia…

  • Ed

    Very long braking distance!—142 ft from 60 mph. That’s about 17 feet more than my 2010 Honda NT700VA. This bike really need dual front disc brakes.

  • Biker-from-India

    Honda, hear this loud…commuters complaints,

    1. Don’t want a bike which goes 0-100km in x seconds, but good mileage. (any way in cities where offices are located, the jam traffic does not allow speeding)

    2. Most of these bikes comes with thin non-cushion seats.
    3. Don’t want to spray mud to the person traveling/biking behind me. Put a proper rear wheel guard.
    4. Rear wheel chain fully covered, so as not to spoil my office pants with grease.

  • Mike M

    I saw one of these at the dealer the other day and was very intrigued. They had it optioned out with the tall wind screen, light bar, a set of GIVI bags and trunk. They had also swapped the factory tires for chunky tread enduros (I didn’t catch the brand). I initially thought this was a full-on factory adventure bike (I haven’t been keeping up with new bikes), so I picked up a brochure to look over later. After careful examination of the brochure, along with this review, I’ve concluded the NC700X is not a true adventure bike, though it might be just fine on good Forrest Service roads.
    While I really like the looks of the bike and Honda’s concept it falls short of the mark for off-road adventure due to limited suspension travel and an exhaust which routed below the engine. One other quirk which would be hard to live with on extended journey’s would be the location of the gas cap. When I load a bike for a long distance trip I always pack something on the rear portion of the seat to lean against (I’m getting old and this helps support my back on long trips). With the NC700X’s design, I would have to remove and reload my gear every time I wanted to top off the tank. That alone is enough to make me pass on this otherwise very interesting bike.