Vincent Rotary A cylindrical Triple from the father of the frameless British V-Twin.

Three cylinder rotary diagram.

We all know that Phil Vincent and his lead engineer, Phil Irving, designed one of the most influential motorcycles of all time: the 61-cubic-inch Vincent V-Twin. This machine was made light, compact and unusually powerful by a variety of techniques that continue to be employed today.

Very few, however, know that Vincent, after the demise of his motorcycle manufacturing business, addressed what he considered to be the outstanding problems of conventional piston engines in a compact three-cylinder rotary with peripheral valves much like those used in high-performance Wankels. Because he was able to raise only very limited backing for his project, Vincent forced it into being by sheer strength of character. Thanks to the generosity of former racer and Cycle World staffer Jody Nicholas, I was lent some of Vincent’s papers and drawings regarding this project.

The cylinder block, containing three 54mm-bore radial cylinders and pistons moving through 18mm strokes, revolved within and sealed against the inside surface of a cylindrical outer ring. Passing through the ring were large intake and exhaust ports. Two sparkplugs were also threaded into it. Both two-stroke and four-stroke versions were contemplated. Valving was accomplished in both cases by the sliding of the open outer ends of the 120-degree-spaced cylinders past intake and exhaust ports in the outer ring.

Drawings for the Vincent Rotary Engine.

To learn more, I got in touch with Big Sid Biberman, a wizard of Vincent tune and a Keeper of the Lore. He said that, unfortunately, the 1961-71 project had generated little more than oily smoke and disappointment.

Vincent well knew that attempts to make high power from conventional engines ran up against limited valve area, valve float and mechanical stress. His rotary sought to provide very large ports unobstructed by rpm-limited mechanical valves. He could see no reason, thanks to his complex hydraulic sealing system, why it should not operate at extreme rpm.

This seemed achievable, I suspect, because Wankel prototypes had, not long before, overcome similar sliding-seal problems to run and make useful power. The leakage and smoking of the Vincent rotary probably resulted from heat distortion of the outer ring around its hot exhaust ports.

Sealing surface distortion around the exhaust ports of two-stroke Grand Prix-bike cylinders in the 1990s was overcome only after development of complex cylinder-shaping technologies. Vincent lacked the resources of a major R&D department to sort out his engine’s problems, so, it came to nothing. The prototype and many of his engineering drawings have been preserved.

  • Roger Downes

    Fascinating design. What i have read is that Phil Vincent was the more fanciful and imaginative, while Phil Irving was the more sound and practical engineer. Perhaps it was a shame that both the Phil`s were not working on this project together.

  • Speed

    Any idea what the rotating mass of this engine was? A motorcycle seems like a tough place to experience the gyroscopic effect of a rotary engine.

  • Speed

    “Both two-stroke and four-stroke versions were contemplated.” The geometry of this engine makes it naturally a two stroke. Any idea how Vincent and Irving were going to implement a four stroke design? Some method of active valve control would be required making the engine more complex.

  • http://www.thevintagent.blogspot.com Paul d’Orléans

    Interesting, the assumptions that Phil Irving helped with this project. Phil Vincent was a qualified engineer and outside-the-box thinker from the get-go, making unusual chassis for his first motorcycles for several years before being joined by Irving, and making his own engines, using a hi-cam design suspiciously like the Velocette ‘M’ series, designed two years earlier. But Veloce never made a big v-twin, and more’s the pity, but at least we have Rapides and Shadows.

    This engine looks as much like a Cross or Aspin rotary as a Wankel, as it uses pistons, and all iterations of no-valve engines have the same oil consumption issues to contend with. The years ’61-71 correspond with a lot of Wankel experiments… revolution was in the air. All right, kick me for the pun.
    For more on Wankel experiments….http://thevintagent.blogspot.com/2011/11/short-history-of-wankel-motorcycles.html