2013 Kawasaki Ninja 300 Dyno Test Dyno Shootout: Honda CBR250R vs. Ninja 250 vs. Ninja 300.

Kawasaki Ninja 300 Dyno Run

My first order of business upon receiving a 2013 Ninja 300 testbike involved rolling the bike onto Cycle World’s Dynojet dynamometer to measure the ponies corralled in Kawasaki’s Shetland-size sportbike. To better show the performance gains of the new liquid-cooled, 296cc parallel-Twin, we’ve laid dyno graphs of a 2011 Kawasaki Ninja 250R and 2011 Honda CBR250R—both of which had been previously tested on our dyno—over that of the Ninja 300.

More CW  First Rides

2013 Kawasaki Ninja 300 – First Ride

Kawasaki picked a prime location for a revved-up and ready-to-ride … [Read More...]

A substantial bump in power output has allowed Kawasaki to fit the 300 with significantly taller overall gearing than what is used on either of the 250s, resulting in a much more relaxed riding experience. While it’s plain to see the sizable boost in peak horsepower the Ninja 300 offers relative to its 250-class competition, don’t underestimate the significant 4-to-6 foot-pound torque advantage the Ninja 300 maintains throughout its entire rev range.

On the road, the Ninja 300 has sufficient low-end torque to keep pace with city traffic without exceeding 6000 rpm at each upshift. The ultra-smooth-revving 300 feels far less busy at freeway speeds, as well, and it now has enough performance headroom to accelerate from 75 mph in top gear without toeing the shifter. Bottom line: The newly added flash-to-pass switch located on the left handlebar is no gimmick.

Move over, VW Golf TDI and Prius prudes, we’re teed-up and playin’ through at 70 mpg!

Kawasaki Ninja 300 Dyno Chart
  • Joseph

    I don’t understand how you can call yourselves a review/information site and not give 0-60 mph times. Acceleration is a huge part of any motorcycle.

    • DEman19901

      I agree. Way more important than dyno numbers. I have been searching for 0-60 times for weeks.

      • Joseph

        Search “2013 Ninja 300 0-60mph” on Youtube. The uploader claims under 6 seconds, but you can’t see his speedometer.

        • DEman19901

          Okay thanks.

        • agrublev

          I will upload my video of doing it in 5seconds, my brother got the Google Glass so i have it perfect quality :)

          • https://www.youtube.com/bench175 Joseph

            What is your Youtube channel?

      • SuperSammy

        Video on Youtube shows a 0-110 in just over 4 seconds. That is of course an Australian video and and in km/h (68 m/h)

        • agrublev

          Link please?

    • DDave

      Perhaps they’ve withheld that info in hopes of selling more paper copies when they print a full review.

      • Joseph

        That might make sense except that there are other free online sites that give this information, and if CycleWorld is not willing to, they will lose visitors.

  • Anthony

    Because no one cares about 0-60 times on a 250/300 !

    • venturamickey

      bull

      • steveomimicko

        not bull at all – if you do then you’re too young to get a bigger bike

        • mickeoy

          bull even a 5 year old cares about how fast is trike will go

          • joe79

            If I am not mistaken, 0-60 in around 5 seconds if you’re Good off the line

  • Rob

    These posts crack me up! Worried about 0-60 times for 250-300 cc engines. Now that’s funny!! If 0-60 times are important to you…you need to move up to a biker class of bike.

    These bikes are made for one purpose…and that is to be a “commuter bike”. Bigger and better than a moped (or scooter), OK performance, with the look of a sport bike.

    Anyone worried about performance, horse power, and 1/4 mile times on these type of motorcycles, needs to move out of their parents basement, or focus on graduating from college. Then they can go buy a motorcycle that is not just commuter.

    • Rob S

      sorry “bigger class of bike”

    • Joseph

      Rob, you probably haven’t seen all the 250′s blasting by the 600′s on the track. Moto3 is also a legit racing class (250cc). So performance really matters even if we are talking about 250-300cc.

      Don’t get me wrong. I ride a litter bike but I also pay serious respect to these small-displacement bikes & their riders.

  • venturamickey

    Hey rob what if the 0-60 time was 5 minutes would it matter then?

    • johnrotten

      pretty sure it’ll be less than 5 minutes.
      Same wheel horsepower as my DR650 and only a little heavier…it’ll just break 6s revved out of its little mind

    • agrublev

      0-60 is 5 seconds on mine… and 60-100 in 8… really nothing to complain about.

  • venturamickey

    It is important to know if your bike will at least get out of the way of the truck behind you shaking his fist eh? A 0-60 could be real important with billy bob on your a–

  • johnny mars

    Let the HP wars begin, even in the entry ranks. Can Yamaha be far behind win a new RD400 two stroke?!

  • http://www.facebook.com/doug.danzeisensr Doug Danzeisen Sr

    Sounds nice for a small bike. Really winds out nicely and very surprising that it puts out almost ten more hp than the 250 version, that is a huge difference. Look forward to a full test. There is nothing wrong with a smaller engined bike, they are much easier to ride than some of the big iron. If they enable more people to ride then that is a very good thing. Keep the rubber side down!

  • Vern

    so which is better ? the 250r or the 300r ninja

  • MPG BS caller

    I don’t see how you can pick on the TDI and Prius, when you don’t seem to have done any actual fuel economy testing here.

    Kawasaki is claiming 68 mpg for the Ninja 300? They claimed 61 mpg for the Ninja 250, but at Fuelly, 80% of riders are reporting worse than that. The actual average is in the low 50′s.

    There are 5 Ninja 300′s at Fuelly already, and the highest any has gotten so far is 62 mpg. It sounds like Kawasaki is consistently about 10 mpg too optimistic.

  • Werner Ackermann

    Is there a reason why the CBR250R’s graph looks so much like the other two twins?

    On all other graphs I’ve seen, the single has a much more pronounced midrange.

  • Anditover

    Nice looking bike, but my KH250 from 1977 was making 28 bhp at the rear wheel and 19 ft/lb torque. Now it’s a 350 and makes 35.25 bhp and 24mm ft/lb, 35 years of development and their engines are Less Powerful. Yeah I know 2 strokes are smelly but my goodness they are fun. Seriously kawasaki missed a trick here they should have made a 300cc triple!

  • http://www.facebook.com/bill.mcgraw.100 Bill McGraw

    You gotta laugh…they are compairing on a dino a bunch of 250′s to a 300…..hmmm will it be better in the top end? Duoh!

    • http://www.facebook.com/jonrhaider Jon Haider

      No one doubted the 300cc would be better at the top end; they’re demonstrating that with only a 20% increase in displacement, you get a 37% power increase and 33% increase in torque, which isn’t bad. So if you were ever thinking about getting a 250 and wasn’t quite sure, this makes that decision a bit easier…

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Htes-A-Nilley/100000962621374 Htes A Nilley

    DAYUMMMM!!! ;D :3 <3!! FULL-INJECTED….mi first bike soon enough!!! Hehehhe

  • http://www.yepi250.com/ yepi250

    i love kawasaki ninja 300. i will buy it soon.

  • http://www.frivk.com/ Friv 4 School

    Your distinctive comment and communication had ME convinced of your
    points. excellent work. Please continue this type of content.

  • crash

    0-60 times are estimated at just under that of a fat kid on a bicycle