2013 Kawasaki Ninja 300 – First Ride

Kawasaki picked a prime location for a revved-up and ready-to-ride motopress to get its first hands-on assessment of the 2013 Ninja 300: Skaggs Springs Road. This flowing ribbon of blacktop flanking Lake Sonoma provides a scenic route through the coastal mountains between U.S. 101 and Pacific Coast Highway north of San Francisco. It’s also quite challenging and entertaining for sportbike riders who are more interested in the next corner rather than some majestic overlook. As it played out, though, the latest iteration of Kawasaki’s legendary lightweight sportbike is as equally adept at sightseeing as it is at apex strafing.

While more torque across the littlest Ninja’s 13,000-rpm rev range from a 47cc bump in displacement to 296cc was a given, the updated engine now also has a more-relaxed nature. According to Kawasaki, taller final gearing (42-tooth rear sprocket, three down from the 250R) combined with a taller internal top-gear ratio allows the six-speed 300 to match the cruising velocity of its predecessor while turning far fewer revs. At an indicated 60 mph in top gear, the analog tachometer registers just 6800 rpm, not the nearly 9000 rpm of the 250R. That’s significant, even if you’re not an interstate traveler.

More CW  Dyno Runs

2013 Kawasaki Ninja 300 Dyno Test

My first order of business upon receiving a 2013 Ninja 300 testbike … [Read More...]

A vastly more rigid, semi-double-cradle steel frame plays a key role in the 300’s improved performance, as well. Even with rubberized front engine mounts, handling is superb. While I felt a hint of buzz through the grips at any given rpm, vibration is significantly less pronounced than on the 250R. Fuel-injection mapping is spot-on, with no lag or stumbles. Driveline lash is not excessive, either.

Shifting is silky-smooth and light, and the addition of a Japanese F.C.C.-brand slipper clutch removes any concern about matching engine revs with rear-wheel speed during downshifts. To put the new setup to the test, I shut the throttle, dropped three gears and dumped the clutch while entering a bumpy corner. The result? Absolutely zero rear-tire-skittering drama.

The “assist” feature of the clutch also performs as advertised, yielding pinky-finger-light lever effort. As with the 250R, however, the new clutch has a narrow band of engagement that takes place virtually at full release of the lever. Smooth takeoffs from a stop are easily achieved with little throttle application or clutch slip.

Even with its slightly smaller 4.5-gallon gas tank, the Ninja 300 should be better suited for longer hauls. The saddle is nicely padded and shaped, and it sits just 30.9 inches off the ground.

As with any small-displacement sportbike, corner speed is the name of the game with this claimed 379-pounder. The new chassis provides more neutral steering feel with no trace of the sensation of falling into corners that I’ve experienced while riding the 250R and Ninja 500. I was also pleased with the enhanced sense of grip and stability that I got from the 140/70-17 IRC rear tire, which is 10mm wider than the 250R’s 130/70-17. Front tire size remains 110/70-17.

We encountered some rather rough stretches of road on our ride, and I’m happy to report that the suspension proved up to the task. The 37mm conventional fork has been treated to lighter damping for improved ride comfort, but oil level is higher, increasing resistance to bottoming under hard braking or over sharp bumps. The shock has firmer damping and a more useful range of spring-preload adjustability to better accommodate a greater range of rider weights.

This bumpy part of the ride was also an opportune time to throw a leg over a Ninja 300 SE equipped with anti-lock brakes. If you can swing the $700 premium, I’d say go for it. The system functions as well as those fitted to bikes that cost far more than this Kawasaki. (The base Ninja 300 comes in Ebony or Pearl Stardust White for $4799; add $200 for Lime Green/Ebony with SE graphics.)

Just as the competition had begun to close in, Kawasaki has answered the challenge. In every sense, the Ninja 300 is a worthy successor to the best-selling Ninja 250R.

  • AM3RIG

    this is so beautiful!

  • johnny mars

    How good is it on gas? ABS is a no brainer. At 6’2″ will I be cramped riding it?

    • Gabe

      About 50 mpg hammering it, probably 70 or more riding mellow.

    • Don Canet

      There was a fuel mileage challenge at the intro. I rode it
      in a very normal fashion over 37 miles of mostly country road with some freeway
      and in-town miles in there as well. According to the Kawi personnel measuring
      fuel used, I managed 67.69 mpg. I’m 5’10″, so I’m not a good judge of how
      well you will fit this bike. The rider triangle is the same as the Ninja 250R.
      I find it to be roomier than the ZX-6R or ZX-10R if that is any indicator for
      you.

  • Steve

    Where is it made ?

    • Gabe

      Thailand, like the old bike and the KLR, Versys and Ninja 650.

  • Moaaz

    Is there a video and any release date set yet?

    • Don Canet

      Kawasaki
      press folks say it’s expected to arrive in dealers early-to-mid October. We
      don’t have a video for this yet.

  • http://www.facebook.com/wattersmt Michael Watters

    This might actually make me trade in the Honda.

  • John Stockman

    Nice move Kawasaki! Yeah, entry-level or beginner-bike is a good thing. The market needs more of these kinds of bikes, instead of many thinking something like a Sportster is a good “beginner bike”. Folks just starting out need a bike with reasonable cornering clearance and actual suspension performance, not just a low seat height…and I’m only 5’6″. After a series of hip replacement surgeries so I could ride again, I got a Kawasaki 250 and put 38,000 miles on it in 2 years. I went all over the west and Canada with some over-the-seat saddle bags, aftermarket windscreen and tank bag. “You can’t tour on a 250″ was what I heard many times. “I’m from Olympia, Wa. and here I am in Westlock, Alberta (or any of the other far-from-home locations) on my 250 and I didn’t get here with my bike on a trailer!” was my reply. Interesting to see how Honda will respond in this category with the CBR250. Great review, thanks!

  • lue

    I love the idea of these small bikes but the problem is that for new
    riders buying any brand new bike is one of the most senseless
    moves you can make. Buy an an older ninja 250 or dual-sport for
    $1000-$2000 . Learn how to ride it and have fun. When you want to sell
    it it you’ll get virtually all your money back.
    If you buy a
    brand new 300 ninja, you’re going to spend nearly $6000 out the door. You will love
    the bike for a few months until you either drop it and scratch it up or
    decide you don’t like riding after all or you decide to move on to
    something bigger and put it up for sale losing 30% or more of your
    investment. At that point you’ll be kicking yourself for buying a brand
    new bike.
    My first motorcycle was a $700 1974 CB200. It was a
    great bike to learn on. Spending $6000 on your first bike is not a wise
    move. Especially when it’s only 300ccs and most people are gong to want
    something bigger in a short amount of time. Resist the urge !! Even as an experienced rider, I would never buy a new motorcycle. I paid $1600 for a mint 2004 Suzuki
    GS500F. That’s a great bike for a beginner or seasoned rider.Having
    said all of that, I would love to try one of these 300 Ninjas, I just
    don’t think it’s a smart move for a new rider to buy a new bike.

    • ShortDude

      Hi, I am a new rider, I am thinking of getting this for my first bike for pleasure riding on freeways/highways, city. I have just passed the MSF class in the USA. I was actually considering in buying ninja 300 as my first bike. The slipper clutch is very appealing to me. I am 5′ 5 my inseam is 28. I don’t think I would get a bigger bike, since I am very short for a guy. If getting a new ninja 300 for $5000ish – $6000 OTD is out of the question, what other sports bikes would you recommend for my inseam?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Htes-A-Nilley/100000962621374 Htes A Nilley

    GORGEOUSNESS…:3 <3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Francisco Carrion

    I’m 5’9 and around 170 and i hear the bike weight limit is around 380. Is This bike comfortable enough for two people two ride on and if so will it have enough power?