Fear of Falling and the Three-Wheel Deal – Steve Thompson

Fear of Falling and the Three-Wheel Deal

We’re all motorcyclists, right?

I’ve been riding the Cycle World long-term-test 2010 Can-Am Spyder RT-S for almost 18 months, and a couple of things about it have become clear. First, it’s still thought to be very cool by many people. And second, a lot of motorcyclists apparently think it’s some kind of affront to motorcycling—a slap in the face of “real” motorcyclists. One of those guys had his young daughter yell out the window of his Honda on a local Northern California road, “My daddy wants to know if those are your training wheels!” Ha-ha, yuk-yuk.

Easy to see how this slam comes about. The Spyder three-wheeler is being pitched not so subtly at all those folks who always wanted to be motorcyclists but couldn’t for one reason or another—and the most commonly assumed reason on the part of many motorcyclists seems to be that the Spyder Ryders are afraid to lean to turn. Wussies, in short. Not fit for calling themselves motorcyclists, unlike the real Manly Men who ride…well, whatever. Or the real Womanly Women who likewise ride two-wheeled devices.

As one of my favorite political-economic columnists might put it, let’s take this apart and see if it holds up. Apart from that issue of having three wheels instead of two, what makes the Spyder not a real motorcycle?

Not leaning to turn. Okay. So here’s a thought-experiment: What if the Spyder did lean to turn? Would it then still not be a real motorcycle? If not, why not?

Opinions will, of course, vary, but my view is that behind all this smoke is the issue of Fear, as in capital-F Fear. The guys making the claim to being Real Motorcyclists (in caps, of course) are claiming the wussies riding three-wheelers of any kind are scared witless by Real Motorcycles because of the possibility of falling down in a turn.

For the sake of argument, let’s allow this to stand; people who fear falling down on bikes might indeed be selecting Spyders because they will have a very tough time falling over. But does that mean that when they launch into the nasty old world of the public highway, they’re somehow exempt from the other threats to life and limb that are part of the powered-two-wheeler package?

Not hardly. You’ll note that there are no airbags or crash cages on a Spyder, trike or sidecar outfit. Ride anything with two or three wheels into the world populated mainly by armored and air-bagged cages and you ride naked, more or less. T-boned at an intersection by a texting kid in a Mustang and it doesn’t matter if you’re on a Harley or a Spyder. Be caught by a left-turning SUV and your chances aren’t much better for emerging without real damage on a three- or two-wheeler. And so on.

Likewise, weather. Hot, cold, rainy, snowy, humid, skin-cracking dry, the Can-Am rider is just as exposed as his/her counterpart on a Suzuki.

In short, the Can-Am Spyder rider is betting just as much on his/her ability to survive the carnage on the highway as the stupid kid stunting on his buddy’s Gixxer, though it is true that the stability of the three-wheeled platform helps in some ways, just as it hinders in others (such as darting through sheet metal as one does in splitting lanes—the Spyder can’t do that).

I often hear guys snort that they’d rather pay what that Spyder costs (and it’s a lot) for a ragtop car. Sure, buy that used Corvette or new Miata and what do you get? Comfort in any weather, assuming you keep the top up to snuff and have an A/C to cool down the hot days with it up. And much better crash protection. The claim is that you also get “out there” in a car even more than on a Spyder or motorcyclist because you don’t need a helmet and can wear lighter clothing, not worrying about abrasion resistance and crash padding. All The Gear All the Time in a ragtop means a T-shirt (optional for males), shorts and sandals, at least if you don’t worry about skin cancer. But are you, in fact, “out there” as much as a Can-Am rider?

Nope. Your lower body is protected by gummint-mandated crash-resistant hardware and software, for starters. And even when you drive in cold weather with the top down, your core and lower body can be toasty warm, thanks to your HVAC system. Moreover, the container of your car’s bodywork still insulates you from the Out There as it does when the top is up. No dog chasing you will nip your ankle in a Miata. And so it goes, one difference after another; if you really think the experience of driving a ragtop is the same as that of riding a three-wheeler, you’re kidding yourself.

So, with all that is the same for the Spyder rider and the Sportster rider, why the continual jabbering about wannabes and wusses? My guess is that it’s just that old cognitive dissonance reduction in action, coupled with the need to protect tribal boundaries against the newcomers.

For as long as I’ve been writing about motorcycles for publication (42 years), the claim has been that we riders are not understood because not enough other people ride out there with us. Well, now there are indeed other people joining us out there, some on three wheels, and it seems long past the time when we just extend a hand and say “Welcome to the ride!” rather than tossing stupid jibes at them.

  • ED

    Amen. As someone who’s physical limitations may soon require me to choose between giving up my two wheels or going to three, it is my intention to ride until I die. Whether it is on two or three wheels makes no difference to me and shouldn’t make a difference to anyone else. 

  • http://sczitdamn.blogspot.com spirukas goblinono

    I’ll try again………Unicycle, Bicycle, Tricycle. A unicycle is for clowns, a tricycle is a three wheeled car, a motorcycle is a bicycle with a motor. Only on two wheels can man and machine combine to truly fight the force of nature called gravity.

  • DL Nielsen

    Since when is a unicycle not subject to the forces of gravity? Seems to me that a unicycle and its rider more truly “fight the force of nature called gravity” than a two-wheeler even if the rider looks a little funny. . . . Personally, I started out on a three-wheeler (called a tricycle), went to two-wheels (bicycles and motorcycles), and may end with a three-wheeler be it a trike conversion or a Spyder. I’ve thought about going from two wheels to a convertible but if a Spyder or trike conversion can help me recapture some of that fun from my youth I’d be all for it. I wore the tread off the front tire of my tricycle before I outgrew it and you could drift it, too. I’ve read so much about the Can-Am Spyder and talked to several different people who ride them that I’ve had to check them out a bit for myself. I can understand why so many of my older friends who can no longer hold up the weight of their big touring bikes are going to Gold Wing trike conversions and Spyders. More power to them. Someday I may be joining their ranks instead of riding along with them on my two-wheeler.

  • rj buchholz

    I have no issue with trikes……but they are not motorcycles. They are clearly more akin to motorcycles than cars, e.g., wind in your face, getting rained on, fearing left-turning SUVs, etc.  I rode a rig with a side-car for years (what was I thinking!), but sidecars, like trikes cannot  accurately  be equated with ” Motorcycles”.

  • Rickr

    I’ve been riding for longer than some of those who sneer at my Spyder have been on this earth. I enjoy being in the wind no matter what the brand but when the right hip gave out I could no longer hold the Valkyrie at a light, so I had to find another way. I triked the Valk but the Spyder is a better machine for my needs. If the Spyder had been around when I bought my early Harleys, Hondas and Suzukis, I think I may have seriously considered three wheels back then. I’m old enough now that I am not bothered by insults from bikers who think theirs is the only way. They just don’t know any better.

  • JRey

    I bought the Spyder RTS when it first came out. I have the special edition 00008 2010. My wife and I have driven from San Antonio, Tx to the Grand Canyon with my two brother in laws whom own harleys. It was interesting when their reverse was not working (Wife gets off and helps pull the bike backwards to park). I just push my button and we backup in place. Or if the wind is blowing I am stable. Safer than falling over and getting hurt. I want to ride and enjoy life. Btw I have a trick knee and unable to hold up a two wheel.

  • dan

    I have both. I have a Yamaha Venture full dresser and a Spyder RT-S. The spyder is actually more like riding a snowmobile or an ATV than riding a bike (of any kind). For me the Spyder gives me much more confidence when bringing my wife along. Holding that 900 pound plus motorcycle with my wife on the back at a light with some gravel on the ground scares the blank out of me. there are advantages to both styles and just as I wave to all types of motorcyclists, we should all welcome each other as there is strength in numbers and those numbers might just count someday when we are fighting for our biking rights!

  • SE Parsons

    3-wheeled vehicles can be neat…for example, the old 3-wheeled Morgans. But I don’t “get” the appeal of the Can Am Spyder, nor that of trikes and sidecar setups (altho they can be neat in and of themselves). You get all the discomforts and danger of a motorcycle, except that it won’t fall over if you forget to put your foot down at a stop, with none of the comforts or safety of a car. Seems to me the biggest disadvantage of the Spyder, trike or sidecar is that it’s steered by a handlebar, which requires a big, somewhat unnatural movement of your upper body to steer it around the corner, whereas a 2-wheeled motorcycle steers with not much more then “thought”. A 3-wheeler with a steering wheel and driving position more like a car would be much more appealing…at least as I see it. Morgans had steering wheels.

  • RC Cowan

    An interesting and, quite obviously, opinion-ridden maching (no pun intended). Seems it isn’t really important what it’s called, given that most states have already decided what it will be licensed as – a motorcycle or an unreal something else. It’s also possible to argue that if handling, braking, advanced safety features, comfort and carrying capability make a “real” motorcycle, then there are a number of “real” motorcycles on the market that aren’t “real” after all. It’s rather amusing that those who claim not to “get It’ aren’t the least bit shy about criticizing it. How can one criticize something one doesn’t “get” – that is to say understand? On second thought, never mind. We’ve collectively been doing that since we learned to walk upright. It’s sad that we seem to be unable to enjoy what we choose to ride and without ridiculing what others choose to ride – for whatever reason. BTW, Steve, it that you and your bride aboard the RT-S in the photograph?

  • Peter

    I guess the point of this blog entry is, don’t be mean to people who ride three-wheeled vehicles. And also, try not to make fun of them.

  • Rudi

    OK, I am not quite one of the people this article is aimed at (I hope) but to be honest my first reaction to the Spyder was “What foul sorcery is this?”.
    To me, personally, the problem with the Spyder IS the lack of leaning. Anything with 3 wheels is not a motorBike and loses one of the major aspects of riding to me PERSONALLY and I would NOT willingly give up my 2 wheels for 3.
    On the other hand, I have no problem with the Spyder being accepted as a motorCycle and as you point out it is really just the leaning (important as that is to me) that is different. I have no trouble riding out there with the 3 wheelers – we have our differences but we still have a common bond. If we are not brothers/sisters then we are surely still cousins.
    If it works for you I would rather see you out there on 3 wheels than being stuck at home or in a cage. Should health stop me riding on 2 wheels I will certainly miss it but go to 3 wheels to keep riding? You bet I will.
    Peace and ride safe.

  • Mark W

    I’ve ridden a Spyder and admit they are fun. Plenty of power, nice ride, comfortable. It seems like I’m describing a new snowmobile, and coming from a snowmobile company, no wonder. These really are more like a Sled/ATV than a bike. Leaning on a bike is what makes them so darn fun. I ride a Harley, but I still love the twistys. Take away leaning through turns and the Spyder has sort of lost what it’s all about. It’s like a street legal snowmobile. But on a sled you run it hot into a corner, tap the brake to produce slide and just before the apex you apply power to bring the controlled slide back under control and shoot down the straight away. wow. Now there’s a thought. I’m thinking you have to drive Spyders where I drive my Harley. Keeping the Harley sparkling is important, but maybe not so much on the Spyder. Some of those twisty gravel roads that take the back way around the lakes might be kinda fun on that over grown snowmobile :)

  • biggyfriesjmshaw357@yahoo.com

    Neither the Spyder nor other three-wheelers are motocycles, but there is obviously a market for them. It is mostly the elderly or the insecure (who are afraid of falling). Of course there are exceptions, but the market is for those who feel three wheels will give that little additional stability.
    That is not really valid, but it seems so to the the buyers of the trikes. And if they pay their money they should get what they want.
    Its like the popularity of 4-wheel ATV’s –they are thought to be safer for the grandkids, so grandpa buys one for putting around on. The kids aren’t really safer, but grandpa feels better about it than if they were on trailbikes. This has been going on for a very long time, so someone will fill that market. Its definitely not for me–I’m still a motorcyclist.

  • Lost_in_Florida

    I started riding and racing when I was 8. I’m a little past the half-century mark now, and I’ve ridden, raced and crashed just about every conceivable wheeled configuration under the sun. I’ve ridden to all of the lower 48 and the southern tier of Canada. I’ve owned (or still own) RD’s, CB’s, FJ’s, FJR’s, VFR’s, lots of things with ‘Z’ in the name, Gixxer’s, CBR’s, CR’s, XR’s, and so on.
    Well, my wife and I just came back from the 200 on our . . . . Spyder RS. And I spent half of the trip perched on the back while she drove. We did the compulsory 2 laps around Daytona after the race, and I was just as anxious as anyone to go WFO up on the banking. (Maybe next year they’ll move the cops and service trucks to the infield.)
    I’m old enough, wise enough, and well-off enough that I don’t give a rat’s ass what anybody else thinks about me or what I ride. Likewise, I could care less what you ride or how freakin’ great you think it is.
    Bottom line: the RS is fun, it’s different, and it’s mine.

  • Mikej77

    For me the main point is physics sticks us with a very narrow tire compared to the rear on powerful bikes and this smaller tire has to do all the braking as well.  The innate tendency is for the front end to wash out though this can be dealt with technique.

    I am really interested in 2 front wheels with a narrow track  so the overall width is not compromised and a leaning configuration.

    There are some prototypes on this scheme and if developed better cornering might result.

    Next up is side cars if you could get a really well engineered rig based on racing tech!

  • BMW_beta_tester

    Motorcycles are single track, cars are dual track and the Spyder is triple track.

    In the real world of pot holes, doesn’t this give an advantage to the motorcycle, provided your sight distance and the laws of physics allow you to pick a line that misses the missing macadam?

  • sthompson

    Interesting comments on this one, and thanks to all for your observations and opinions. However, focusing on the question of whether or not the Spyder, a trike, or a sidecar rig might or might not be a “motorcycle” was not the point of my blogum. (A “blogum” is a “blog-column” in edit-speak. Please do not point out the obvious connection between “blogum” and “bunkum”!)
    The real point, as I see it, is that to ensure that the interests and requirements of motorcycles of any kind are carefully considered by the “stakeholders” in the transportation-infrastructure changes of the near future, all who ride exposed, using handlebars and helmets, should be welcomed as people who have made the same, or nearly the same choices we who have long ridden on two wheels have made. The social and political consequences of welcoming them to the “club”, as it were, are potentially game-changing for motorcycling, considering how little priority is routinely given to riding as transportation inside the D.C Beltway, as I discovered after I visited the Intelligent Transportation Society of America’s HQ following the passage of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Whether one rides on public roads for pleasure or transportation or both, ignoring the general blindness of the transportation-biz elite to motorcycling will not be good for any of us.
    Regarding the various pluses and minuses of any three-wheeled vehicle vis-a-vis a single-track machine, most of the comments here are accurate, in my experience. Maybe more to the point, as anyone who has read my 2008 book, “Bodies in Motion: Evolution and Experience in Motorcycling” will know, I believe that the leaning single-track vehicle (a conventional motorcycle, in other words) is so much fun for so many of us for reasons rooted in our species evolutionary history, which I delineate in the book. It is thus the most “natural.” Losing my ability to ride such machines thanks to a near-fatal crash that left me left leg paralyzed has been devastating to me, and there is absolutely no question that for me, the Spyder, a conventional trike or a sidecar is not nearly as rewarding.

    -S. Thompson

  • touristguy87

    “Apart from that issue of having three wheels instead of two, what makes the Spyder not a real motorcycle?”

    since someone deleted my initial dismissal of the question, I’ll answer in further detail: “the fact that it’s not a real motorcycle”.

    It’s a trike, NOT A BIKE.
    Do you really need this explained to you?

    It’s a slightly bigger and faster version of a tricycle. Think of any tricycle that you’ve seen riding around. Now take those TWO wheels and replace them with ONE and ask yourself whether the tub riding it would be just as eager to be there on it.

    Enough of the wishful thinking. You sound like all the people who say that knock-offs are just as good as the real thing.

    End of story.

  • Greybeard

    I have no complaints with three wheels. It’s a neat machine.
    But it takes up the space of a car. It gets the same fuel economy as a car.
    It costs as much as a car, (unless you buy a cheaper Kia Rio.)
    Me? If I want a three wheeler I’ll buy a sidehack so I can comfortably carry wife AND Dog, and get better mileage.