What Next For Electrics?

Weighing the options.

What Next For Electrics?

I recently heard an interesting radio discussion of financial realities affecting the electric-vehicle business. Businesses do not emerge from nothing. They are the joining of a business plan with, in this case, money from venture capitalists. In the normal course of affairs, venture capitalists expect to cash out when the companies they have funded “go public,” making an IPO, or Initial Public Offering, on the stock market. The current trouble is that some of these companies that had planned IPOs have now withdrawn them. Why? It may sound strange in a world that nods and smiles at vague concepts such as sustainability or “green-ness,” but potential investors want to make money. These companies are not doing that. Only Tesla is going ahead with its IPO.

The problem is that 1) electrics, however well proven technically, cost a lot more than the market value of their function; and 2) the infrastructure and technology for rapid recharging don’t exist.

I often hear the standard apologia for the high prices of electrics. The strongest is the airy notion that “Good citizens should be willing to pay extra to save the planet.” The second part is the prospect of subsidies. My problem with the first part is that the price of goods is a rough measure of the degree of environmental pressure their construction causes. If a Chevy Volt costs roughly twice as much as a Chevy Cobalt, that extra money presumably pays for extra resource extraction and processing in factories.

The second part is better: the special privilege of electric vehicle makers to effectively sell their products more than once—through subsidies. The first sale is to the end user. The second sale is to the taxpayer, through Federal subsidy. The third sale may be to residents of any states that vote their own subsidies.

I am all for electric vehicles as a market choice, just as I take pleasure in hearing the wonderful rock-crusher sound of a Ducati 1098R’s valves. This is variety—the spice of life. But there are underlying realities to keep in mind.

  • Don Storing

    Although electrics look interesting and promising, the end poduct and efficiency is ot as simple as some would have us believe. What about the pollution and resources used in the production of the batterys and the electricity to recharge them? None of that is without cost, economically and ecologically.

  • http://plugbike.com/ skadamo

    Oh wow, been waiting for comments on the CW blog. Nice!! Seems the return key does not work in this text box.


    1) electrics, however well proven technically, cost a lot more than the market value of their function;


    They do cost a lot more unless they open new doors to new ways of riding. Have noise issues? Need funding for a riding area and another “gasser park” is not interesting to investors? Investors love green and I’m not talk’n benjamins :D More later, this not have a return key is worrying me…

  • Brix

    I understand that an electric motor delivers gobs of torque from 0 to its limit. That doesn’t explain why electric motorcycle mfrs don’t take a proven light/middle-weight design (Suzuki DR 650 comes to mind) and add batteries in place of cylinders — keeping the transmission to improve range and top end.

    Sure, you could design something very high tech from the ground up, but taking an existing design and adding an electric motor and batteries in place of a pair of cylinders should yield a great little commuter for not much more than the equivalent gas-powered vehicle. Yes it might have 1/3 the range but a $5k bike I could ride 30 mi round-trip to work every day for FREE (almost) really would pay for itself in no time.

  • oldengineer

    A director of advanced engineering at General Motors in the 1980s once said words to the effect that an electric car is like a 4,000 pound Chevette that has a one-cylinder engine and a one-gallon gas tank… that takes all night to fill.
    Batteries are only slightly better in gravimetric and volumetric energy storage than they were then.
    As urban second vehicles, battery electrics might have a place… if urban areas want more motor vehicle concentration. I don’t see it.